nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 04, No.150 38-50
碳排放交易和绿证交易制度政策模拟研究——基于动态CGE模型
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划(2021YFB2400700); 国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA081)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2024.04.005
摘要:

在未来碳排放交易和绿证交易逐步推行的背景下,模拟研究碳排放交易和绿证交易政策对经济社会的影响具有重要意义。本文引入“能源-政策”模块将政策的成本收益嵌入一般均衡模型,构建了我国能源市场可计算动态一般均衡模型,对碳排放交易和绿证交易制度的作用影响进行模拟仿真。研究结果表明,不同的碳减排目标对宏观经济和产业产出的影响不同。在宏观经济方面,严格的碳减排政策可能对经济产生一定负面影响,造成碳价提升;在产业产出方面,碳减排政策能够在一定程度上优化中间部门产业结构,对石油、化工、钢铁等碳排放量较高的产业发展起到抑制作用。基于能源要素的替代效应,新能源产业的产出得到提升,进而实现产业和能源结构的优化。

Abstract:

In order to simulate and study the impact of carbon emissions trading and green certificate trading policies on the economy, this paper introduces the "energy-policy" module to embed the cost and benefit of policies into the model, and constructs a computable dynamic general equilibrium model of China's energy market to simulate the effect of carbon emissions trading and green certificate trading system. The results show that different carbon emission reduction targets have different impacts on macroeconomic and industrial output. In the macro economy, the strict carbon emission reduction policy may have a certain negative impact on the economy, resulting in the rise of carbon price. In terms of industrial output, the carbon emission reduction policy can optimize the industrial structure of the intermediate sector to a certain extent,and inhibit the development of industries with high carbon emissions such as petroleum, chemical industry and steel. Based on the substitution effect of energy elements, the output of the new energy industry is improved, and then the energy structure is optimized. The research in this paper provides new theoretical evidence for energy transformation and upgrading under the policy background of implementing carbon emissions trading and green certificate trading system.

参考文献

[1]冯升波,黄建,周伏秋,等.碳市场对可再生能源发电行业的影响[J].宏观经济管理,2019(11):55-62.

[2]张英英,吴可仲.探路绿电交易:亟待与绿证、碳市场衔接并轨[N].中国经营报,2022-07-04(C08).

[3]杨雪,金孝俊,王海洋,等.基于区块链的绿证和碳交易市场联合激励机制[J].电力建设,2022,43(06):24-33.

[4]马丽娜,章建明,和晓东.浅析电力市场与碳市场协同发展的必要性[J].电器工业,2022(09):76-79.

[5]杨威,龚学良,曾智健,等.碳排放交易市场机制对电力市场的影响:基于碳价需求响应的电力市场用户行为分析[J].南方电网技术,2022,16(08):59-67.

[6]薛贵元,吴晨,王浩然,等.“双碳”目标下碳市场与电力市场协同发展机制分析[J].电力科学与工程,2022,38(07):1-7.

[7]林伯强.现代能源体系下的碳市场与电力市场协调发展[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2022(13):56-65.

[8]Nilsson M,Sundqvist T.Using the market at a cost:How the introduction of green certificates in Sweden led to market inefficiencies[J].Utilities Policy,2007,15(01):49-59.

[9]Lemming J.Financial risks for green electricity investors and producers in a tradable green certificate market[J].Energy Policy,2003,31(01):21-32.

[10]Bird L,Chapman C,Logan J,et al.Evaluating renewable portfolio standards and carbon cap scenarios in the U.S.electric sector[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(05):2573-2585.

[11]Morthorst P E.Interactions of a tradable green certificate market with a tradable permits market[J].Energy Policy,2001,29(05):345-353.

[12]Wenhui Z,Shuwen F,Jiansheng H,et al.Noncooperative multiagent game model for the electricity market on the basis of the renewable energy portfolio standard[J].Engineering Reports,2022,4(10):77-96.

[13]Tian-tian F,Rong L,Hui-min Z,et al.Induction mechanism and optimization of tradable green certificates and carbon emission trading acting on electricity market in China[J].Resources,Conservation&Recycling,2021,169:21-49.

[14]Kemfert C,Welsch H.Energy-capital-labor substitution and the economic effects of CO2 abatement:evidence for Germany[J].Journal of Policy Modeling,2000,22(06):641-660.

[15]Dissou Y,Mac Leod C,Souissi M.Compliance costs to the Kyoto protocol and market structure in Canada:a dynamic general equilibrium analysis[J].Journal of Policy Modeling,2002,24(07/08):751-779.

[16]Wissema W,Dellink R.AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy[J].Ecological Economics,2007,61(04):671-683.

[17]Galinato G I,Yoder J K.An integrated tax-subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction[J].Resource and Energy Economics,2010,32(03):310-326.

[18]卢晓芸,雷雪.基于CGE模型的最优碳税水平及碳税政策效应分析[J].金融发展研究,2022(09):62-70.

[19]陆春华,李晨光,李虹.基于动态CGE模型的碳税政策促进江苏省低碳发展研究[J].科学决策,2022(06):54-72.

[20]苏小宁.山西省碳排放增长因素分解与基于CGE模型的碳税政策效果模拟研究[D].太原:山西财经大学,2022.

[21]李小倩.基于CGE模型的碳税效应模拟分析[D].石家庄:河北经贸大学,2022.

[22]刘昕,姚西龙,全娟志,等.兼顾效率与公平的税收返还机制研究--基于动态CGE模型[J].煤炭经济研究,2022,42(04):22-29.

基本信息:

DOI:10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2024.04.005

中图分类号:X196

引用信息:

[1]曾鸣,贺薪颖.碳排放交易和绿证交易制度政策模拟研究——基于动态CGE模型[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2024,No.150(04):38-50.DOI:10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2024.04.005.

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划(2021YFB2400700); 国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA081)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文