861 | 0 | 133 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
李汝珍《镜花缘》中的女性主题历来备受关注,但单独讨论性别很容易为现代观念所束缚。这部小说创造性地将女性形象置于国家的视野中加以呈现,“女儿国”的构想既作为乌托邦,又作为国家实体而存在。从女性与国家权力的关系入手,可以更全面地理解小说的话语结构。海外女儿国的性别身份秩序建立在与他国的对照中,结构性的男女对立在这里被表现为直接的暴力。天朝女君武则天既是女性权益的保护者,又是颠倒阴阳的暴君,以她为核心的女性自治,不得不导向虚无的结局。天朝与海外番邦之间的华夷之辨模仿着男女之间的性别规范,女儿国的颠倒结构却对天朝秩序构成了反讽。小说中的女性形象既是现实的再现,又在政治话语中成为男性的隐喻。
Abstract:The female topic in Li Ruzhen's Flowers in the Mirror has continuously received much attention, however, discussing gender alone can easily be restricted by modern ideas. The novel creatively presents female figures in the context of the state. The “Country of Women” idea is expressed both as a utopia and a national entity. The discourse structure of this novel would have a more comprehensive interpretation by considering the relationship between women and state power. In the overseas Country of Women, the gender identity is established in contrast to other states, where the structural gender opposition is represented as direct violence. Wu Zetian, the female emperor of the Celestial Empire, is depicted as a protector of women's rights and a tyrant who reverses yin and yang. Thus the female autonomy centered on her turns into nothingness eventually. The distinction between Chinese and foreign states mimics the gender norms between men and women, while the inverted structure of the Country of Women becomes an irony of the central empire. The female figures in the novel are both representations of reality and metaphors for males in political discourse.
[1]浴血生.小说丛话[J].新小说,1905(05).
[2]胡适.《镜花缘》的引论[M]//胡适著,李小龙编.中国旧小说考证.北京:商务印书馆,2014:456.
[3]夏志清.文人小说家和中国文化--对《镜花缘》的重新评价[J].包振南,译.国外社会科学情况,1987(03):42-48.
[4]李剑国,占骁勇.《镜花缘》丛谈[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2004:414.
[5]李汝珍著,孙海平校点.汇评本镜花缘[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2018.
[6]杨念群.从科学话语到国家控制--对女子缠足由“美”变“丑”历史进程的多元分析[M]//汪民安主编.身体的文化政治学.开封:河南大学出版社,2004:17-19.
[7]高彦颐.缠足:“金莲崇拜”盛极而衰的演变[M].苗延威,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2009:139-181.
[8]爱新觉罗裕瑞.枣窗闲笔·《镜花缘》书后[M]//富察明义,爱新觉罗裕瑞.绿烟琐窗集枣窗闲笔.上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.
[9]杨念群.何处是“江南”?:清朝正统观的确立与士林精神世界的变异[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2017:273-280.
[10]葛兆光.宅兹中国:重建有关“中国”的历史论述[M].北京:中华书局,2011:41-65.
[11]罗鹏.性别与表述:重读《镜花缘》[M]//陈平原,王德威,商伟编.晚明与晚清:历史传承与文化创新.武汉:湖北教育出版社,2002:302-309.
[12]吴承恩著,李贽评,古众校点.李卓吾批评西游记[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1991:743.
[13]魏爱莲.晚明以降才女的书写、阅读与旅行[M].赵颖之,译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2016:168.
[14]魏爱莲.美人与书:19世纪中国的女性与小说[M].马勤勤,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015:92.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.01.012
中图分类号:I207.419
引用信息:
[1]邢晨雨.国家与性别之间:《镜花缘》“女儿国”叙事的政治面向[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2023,No.141(01):101-108.DOI:10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2023.01.012.
基金信息: