nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 05, No.157 29-41
有偿分配制度下的政企碳交易演化博弈分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目“电力需求侧信息质量的测量体系与改进方法研究”(71964022)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2025.05.004
投稿时间: 2024-12-09
投稿日期(年): 2024
修回时间: 2025-01-20
终审时间: 2025-02-23
终审日期(年): 2025
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2025-10-20
出版时间: 2025-10-20
移动端阅读
摘要:

碳市场是实现双碳目标的重要手段,我国在碳市场运行初期对纳入碳市场的行业进行配额时都是免费分配,在未来将适时采用有偿分配的分配方式。为探究有偿分配制度下影响企业在碳市场交易及政府监管策略的因素,构建了政府与企业之间的演化博弈模型,对不同情境下的系统演化稳定策略进行确定,并选取了相关数据进行仿真分析。分析结果表明,在碳配额有偿分配制度下,政府与企业之间存在不同的演化博弈结果,各主体间策略选择互相影响,中央政府的策略选择会受地方政府的影响,但作为政策的推动者,始终会选择严格监管的策略;在碳市场建设初期政府除牵头为企业寻找交易对象外,还应给予交易双方相应的交易奖励;随着参与碳交易的企业逐渐增加,中央政府受监管成本影响,其策略选择也会发生改变,本文从四方博弈的主体出发,为有偿分配制度下碳市场交易制度及运行模式提供了系统的理论指导。

Abstract:

The carbon market is an important means to achieve the dual carbon goals. In the early stages of carbon market operation, China adopted a free allocation method for quota allocation of industries included in the carbon market. In the future, a paid allocation method will be adopted in a timely manner. To explore the factors that affect enterprises in carbon market trading and government regulatory strategies under the paid allocation system, an evolutionary game model between the government and enterprises was constructed. The stable strategy of system evolution in different scenarios was determined, and relevant data was selected for simulation analysis. The analysis results showed that under the paid allocation system of carbon quotas, there are different evolutionary game results between the government and enterprises, and the strategic choices of various entities affect each other. The transaction cost of enterprises has a negative impact on trading enterprises. In the early stage of carbon market construction, the government should not only lead the search for trading partners for enterprises, but also provide corresponding trading rewards to both parties. As the number of enterprises participating in carbon trading gradually increases, the central government's strategic choices will also change due to regulatory costs. Starting from the main body of the four party game, this article provides systematic theoretical guidance for the carbon market trading system and operating mode under the paid distribution system.

参考文献

[1]蔡宁.借鉴国际经验加强碳市场建设[J].中国金融, 2022(04):63-64.

[2]陈毅非,刘宸毓.碳排放权交易配额初始分配机制探讨[J].合作经济与科技, 2019(04):88-89.

[3]周建鹏,聂华林,张国兴,等.低碳经济背景下企业生产策略的演化博弈分析——基于机制设计理论的视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(24):88-91.

[4]王维国,王霄凌.基于演化博弈的我国高能耗企业节能减排政策分析[J].财经问题研究, 2012(04):75-82.

[5]朱庆华,王一雷,田一辉.基于系统动力学的地方政府与制造企业碳减排演化博弈分析[J].运筹与管理, 2014, 23(03):71-82.

[6]付秋芳,忻莉燕,马士华.惩罚机制下供应链企业碳减排投入的演化博弈[J].管理科学学报, 2016, 19(04):56-70.

[7]徐建中,贯君,朱晓亚.政府行为对制造企业绿色创新模式选择影响的演化博弈研究[J].运筹与管理, 2017, 26(09):68-77.

[8] Yu N, Chen J H, Cheng L. Evolutionary game analysis of carbon emission reduction between government and enterprises under carbon quota trading policy[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022, 19(14):8565.

[9] Zhang C, Zhang X X. Evolutionary game analysis of air pollution co-investment in emission reductions by steel enterprises under carbon quota trading mechanism[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 317:115376.

[10] Zhang S Y, Wang C X, Pardalos P M. Co-evolutionary game of manufacturers’ abatement behavior under carbon tax-subsidy policy[J]. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 2021, 16(04):1217-1228.

[11] Cao K Y, Xu X P, Wu Q, et al. Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167:505-513.

[12] Zhu G, Pan G Z, Zhang W W. Evolutionary game theoretic analysis of low carbon investment in supply chains under governmental subsidies[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(11):2465.

[13]方国昌,何宇,田立新.碳交易驱动下的政企碳减排演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学, 2024, 32(05):196-206.

[14]杨霞,何刚,吴传良,等.碳交易机制下政府与重污染企业碳减排演化博弈分析[J].安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(11):4097-4107.

[15]闫佳彤,黄书培,李文龙.双碳目标下基于演化博弈的高耗能企业节能降碳机制[J].资源科学, 2022, 44(08):1723-1734.

[16]孙冬营,薛诗,许玲燕,等.考虑政府双重角色的排污权二级市场交易行为演化博弈分析[J].软科学, 2021, 35(10):122-129,

[17]崔宁,周宇,赵晓亮.四方主体参与碳减排的演化博弈研究[J].中国环境科学, 2023, 43(12):6788-6802,

[18]孙淑慧,苏强.重大疫情期医药研究报道质量监管四方演化博弈分析[J].管理学报, 2020, 17(09):1391-1401.

[19]贾彩云.澳大利亚碳定价机制及其对中国的启示[D].青岛:中国海洋大学, 2014.

[20]魏宁,刘胜男,李桂菊,等. CCUS对中国粗钢生产的碳减排潜力评估[J].中国环境科学, 2021, 41(12):5866-5874.

[21]石敏俊,袁永娜,周晟吕,等.碳减排政策:碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之?[J].管理科学学报, 2013, 16(09):9-19.

基本信息:

DOI:10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2025.05.004

中图分类号:F279.2;X196;F832.5

引用信息:

[1]李艳梅,于子钦.有偿分配制度下的政企碳交易演化博弈分析[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2025,No.157(05):29-41.DOI:10.14092/j.cnki.cn11-3956/c.2025.05.004.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金项目“电力需求侧信息质量的测量体系与改进方法研究”(71964022)

投稿时间:

2024-12-09

投稿日期(年):

2024

修回时间:

2025-01-20

终审时间:

2025-02-23

终审日期(年):

2025

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2025-10-20

出版时间:

2025-10-20

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文